B&Q and Wickes cut supply of illegal timber
Published: 1 February 2012
The Forest Stewardship Council revealed this week that any sale of illegally-sourced Asia Plywood produce from Wickes and B&Q was done "in good faith" as the supplier failed to inform them that its FSC certification had been revoked.
A recent Daily Mail article accused B&Q and Wickes of continuing to sell wood 'felled illegally from [a] Borneo rainforest' despite an investigation by the Scientific Certification Systems (SCS) finding Asia Plywood in breach of sourcing rules.
In response, Wickes said it was "disappointed with the recent allegation in the Daily Mail that it is selling illegal timber in breach of standards." While the retailer has stopped sourcing from the rogue supplier, it is still selling its remaining stock of the controversial product to save the environmental cost of wasting it and sourcing more wood to replace it.
B&Q was also quick to deny any wrong-doing, saying it had taken action as soon as "a potential supplier accreditation issue" was brought to its attention in early December last year.
The article went on to question the FSC's involvement, saying the body had continued to authorise sales of the hardwood until its certification ran out in December, despite the SCS advising that none of its products made since February 2011 should have been sold.
According to the FSC, an investigation by SCS in December 2011 revealed Asia Plywood had failed to provide adequate evidence of the certified origin of the wood use in FSC Mixed products and supplied to retailers, including B&Q and Wickes.
The FSC says that as a result Asia Plywood's certificate was terminated and the SCS demanded the company contact all buyers to inform them that all products bought between February and December last year were not in compliance with FSC rules.
Furthermore, the authority says it requested Asia Plywood follow up with its customers to remove all references to FSC from stock purchased from the company and sell the wood only as uncertified.
According to the FSC, Asia Plywood did not inform B&Q, Wickes or any other customer of the change in scope of its certificate, as was required by its certification contract.
The FSC told DIY Week that Asia Plywood's actions represented "a rare misuse of the FSC system by one of its certificate holders."
B&Q said it had pulled all Asia Plywood stock from its shelves on Friday, January 27, which is when the FSC trademark license for the supplier was terminated by FSC International.
A spokesperson told DIY Week: "We were alerted to a potential supplier accreditation issue regarding plywood on December 7 2011, and immediately took action. We had sourced a small amount of product from this supplier from October 2011 and as soon as we were made aware, all future shipments of this plywood were immediately cancelled.
"We sought and received written assurances from FSC ... as recently as January 13th that B&Q's current stock is FSC certified, which remained valid until potential further information came to light on Friday, January 27.
"As a result we launched a further investigation and, while this is underway, we have taken the decision to remove any existing stock of this plywood from our shelves from Friday, January 27. We have done this because we are proud of our heritage in this area and are committed to ensuring that our customers can be assured there is no doubt whatsoever about our supply chain."
Wickes, meanwhile, told us: "[We] have not purchased any product from Asia Plywood since we were made aware of the withdrawal of its FSC certification on December 15 2011, at which time we re-sourced to an alternative supplier. We believe that the right course of action and best for the environment is to sell through the remaining product rather than scrap it and manufacture and ship more to replace it.
"All of us in the timber supply chain have a responsibility to work in a collaborative way to ensure that, if things do go wrong, information is shared quickly and accurately so that the standard remains an effective assurance of best practice."