Essential reading for retailers and suppliers in the home improvement market

Visitors and exhibitors praise 'downsized' Glee

Published: 6 October 2009
2009 exhibition hailed as best trade show in years by buyers and suppliers who attended.
Visitors and exhibitors praise 'downsized' Glee
The 34th annual Glee exhibition was a welcome surprise for many who attended, explained show director Daniel Thurlow. "The feedback has been excellent; indeed the smaller footprint of the show has had a positive impact - the aisles were packed and buzzing with people doing business. In fact, many exhibitors have told us that they wrote more business at Glee than at any other trade show in the last three years. Visitors commented that they felt less rushed, allowing them to spend more quality time on stands."

However, Mr Thurlow said it wasn't a surprise that visitor numbers were "a little lower" than last year, as a result of consolidation in the marketplace, tough trading conditions and the fact that Glee was a smaller show this year. Glee's unaudited figures revealed that 14,500 people attended the Birmingham-based show this year, compared with just over 18,000 last year and a little more than 22,000 the year before.

Visitors were impressed by the atmosphere and new features of the 2009 show. Scotsdale Garden Centre managing director Caroline Owen explained: "I think the show is great. I love the Innovators Zone, and Glee New Products is even better this year. It's excellent for networking too."

Organisers are now looking ahead to Glee 2010, hoping to build on the success of this year's show. Mr Thurlow said: "For 2010 we will be building on the positive environment created this year, we'll look to welcome back absent brands and showcasing the newest products and suppliers...We'll also refresh the visitor features that proved so popular this year."

For full comments from both exhibitors and visitors, plus a rundown of what there was to see on stand, check out DIY Week's Glee Review in the October 30 issue.

Comments

Published prior to March 2014
By Jon Layton
I have to say as a 15 year plus exhibitor I found Glee a sad shadow of it's former glory. I talked to many visitors who couldn't believe how the landscaping hall in particular had failed and exhibitors who had to endure ' tumbleweed Tuesday'. I can't believe the 'spin'.
Published prior to March 2014
By john fowler
I have to agree some what with the neagtive comments.
Show organisers do all ways spin the truth to make it sound like a great show.. And i have often heard sales people do the same with orders and clients seen.. The NEC is costly to do a show at, organisers do often make vast profits, but the truth would be nice to know one day !
Published prior to March 2014
By Beccy Page
I fully agree with Mr Stevens. Why not combine GLEE and Autumn Fair(another ailing show). I am sure the suppliers who exhibit at both would welcome this along with buyers who have to travel to the NEC twice in the space of 3 weeks. I would rather do 3 full days at a combined show than trying to cram one show into a days visit.
Published prior to March 2014
By Matt
I agree with mr stevens
Published prior to March 2014
By Will Parsons, editor, DIY Week
I am sorry to read that Mr Stevens so obviously didn't find the show fruitful or profitable. I wonder what specifically about his experience brought him to the conclusion that the show was 'very poor indeed'?
I can only assure him that DIY Week did solicit opinion from both a large number of the exhibitors at the show and from key buyers attending from the garden retail and hardware sectors. In fact, they were the basis of my last editorial comment in DIY Week, published last week. As per the news story, these comments will be published in full in our official Glee review in the October 30 issue of the magazine. However, ahead of that, it is fair to say that overwhelmingly the response from both visitors and exhibitors alike has been positive. Of course there are factors that have caused some level of concern (smaller show, fewer exhibitors, lack of some big names) but on the whole these appear not to have impacted too detrimentally on visitor experience and in many cases have actually had a positive effect.
That is not to say that every visitor (or exhibitor) had a positive show, only that our own research fully supports the findings of the show organisers.
Published prior to March 2014
By G Stevens
Utter nonsense. I think you should research independent comments from visitors before posting this tosh.If the smaller footprint of the show was a positive why bother trying to recapture the absent brands- typical spin from an organisation with head buried in sand. Show was very poor indeed. For those of you who Can't wait for full comments visit www.landscapejuice.

(Your email address will not be published)
1 + 1 =  
Already Registered?
Sign In
Not Yet Registered?
Register
Printable View E-mail Bookmark
*

Latest reader comments

re: Latest update on Green Homes Grant and implications for homeowners and landlords

John Hart
After applying for a green homes how long will it take for a decision? thanks...

re: SX Rainproof Exterior Caulk

Wally
I need the exterior sx rain resistant caulk! Can't get it anywhere so please help! How can I order it? Need it yesterday...

re: BCT can replicate any material in a ceramic tile

Christina Tiritanou
Not sure if you can help as I require a tile which has the measurements of 6”x 6”? Thank you....

re: Latest update on Green Homes Grant and implications for homeowners and landlords

colin thompson
SarahVery clear and helpful information.Thanks...

Most read stories